
Photographer Wing Huie took this seemingly ordinary picture
of David and Lou in South
Minneapolis, Minnesota in 2012. Upon first glance, you can see two adult men,
one white and one black, casually sitting on a porch outside. It is clear that
these two friends are wearing glasses and have similar facial hair. In addition
to exhibiting similar poses, these two friends appear to not be too photogenic
nor pleased with the photographer based on their facial expressions. Despite
their lack of interest, they seem relaxed and content with where they are,
solely based on their posture and residential location. Through the reflection
in the window, you notice a short, wide building which is most likely a small office building. Paint is peeling off the railings and the house looks
relatively small from what is seen in the photo. The windows are large and high, typically found on one-story homes.
The interracial "bromance" shown in the photo depicts the
photographer’s interest in diversity among lower income communities. Both
men, especially the one on the left, are casually dressed in what appears to be
midday. This indicates that they either work part time or do any odd jobs available.
Due to the clear paint peelings, one can assume they cannot afford to keep
their humble abode in pristine condition. The piece presents an intriguing
situation where two racially different men of different backgrounds come
together to form an inseparable friendship of over seven years. These “brothers
from another mother” don’t care about any racial barriers, and neither should
the viewer.
Both Wing Young Huie and Margaret Atwood present “othering”
in some shape or form within their works. In David and Lou, the two men are dressed in considerably different apparel
and are of different races. This is enough to instill a sense of othering
between the photo’s characters. Also, the pillar erected between the two men
acts as a literal divider of the white man and the black man. The
photographer purposefully took the photo at such an angle to make it easier for
the reader to distinguish between the individuals.
In Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, “othering” is clearly seen in the social classes
as well as gender. For example, each class has a designated color to wear and
duty in society. The Bible is manipulated to support “othering” by defining the
societal rules. Only a select few men of authority are allowed to read it, so
no one can really disprove the gospel verses. Public information is highly filtered
and censored by the government, so much so, that people in Gilead are
completely unaware of the events and norms in other countries.
Good post!! I saw this picture on the website, but I didn't know how to connect it to "othering". You did a great job of depicting the picture and the story behind. You looked deep into the imagery which helped me understand the purpose of the picture better. The example from The Handmaid's Tale displayed "othering" well. I liked your mention of Bible quotes supporting their society. I think it's scary that they could use such an accepted source to create such an awful society. Overall - great analysis and connection!
ReplyDeleteI agree with Sasha! I too saw this picture but I didn't know how to connect to othering, and I think you hit it spot on. I really like your analysis of the pillar between the men. I also liked your noting of the difference between the men's clothing. Do you think clothing corresponds to race? I think that as we other certain races, we use their clothing to do so. I also liked your analysis of Gilead's twisted source of information. Can any parallels be drawn between the manipulation of information in Gilead and our own society? I think that just like the government twists information to other certain groups and genders, our own media twists information (maybe subconsciously?) to other certain races.
ReplyDeleteI thought your comparisons between these two men were interesting. It is cool to note that both of these men have similar positions, hair, and clothing, and the only notable difference between them is their race. I liked that you pointed out the pillar dividing the two men. Maybe the positions of the men have signifigance as well. The white guy is sitting on the ledge with his legs dangling, while the black guy has his legs within the porch and he is behind a black fence. Maybe this shows that the white man has is free to move, while the black guy is trapped in his social, economic, and societal position. While David and Lou are remarkably similar, they are treated by society in starkly contrasting ways.
ReplyDeleteI'm happy to see that you and your peers quickly saw the contrast in this image (race, clothing colors, position, etc.). Be careful you are not making generalizations or assumptions that can't be supported or do not add to your analysis. I love that you talked about the setting being significant to Wing Young Huie's composition.
ReplyDeleteI also liked your connection to THT- many overlook that all of the citizens are others in the eyes of the outside world.